Best Backpacking Stove Spread

A paradigm shift in what makes the best backpacking stove system

A new paradigm has emerged in the backpacking stove landscape, and the performance bar is higher than ever. The optimal system now combines a heat exchanger pot with a wind-resistant and pressure-regulated burner. Together they offer lightning fast boil times, exceptional fuel economy, low weight, and unhindered performance in cold and wind. We call this combo a SuperStove, and if you don’t have one, it’s time to upgrade.

Buyer beware – the marketplace and has not caught up yet. Many brands are still producing and marketing old school systems that are either heavy, bulky, expensive, lack heat exchangers, or are impractically ultralight and incapable of boiling water in cold and wind. A quick meta-study of other “expert” gear reviewers indicates that this buyer’s guide is the only literature at the cutting edge of backpacking stove technology. So read on…

Our assessments are grounded in a combination of hands-on field experience, and backed up by controlled performance boil speed and fuel-usage testing in simulated real world shoulder-season and year-round mountain morning conditions (35F, 5 mph wind) — conditions we feel all stoves should perform well in. In summary, we’re absolutely confident in our recommendations: for most backpackers a SuperStove is the best stove for all of their trips.

While you’re here, don’t miss our comprehensive guide to SuperStoves, backpacking pots, backpacking food, freeze dried meals, long handle spoons, mugs, and water filters.

You make Adventure Alan & Co possible. When purchasing through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no additional cost to you. Here’s why you can trust us.

Best Backpacking Stove System

Best Backpacking Stove Components

adventure alan cooking with the best backpacking stove

Best Backpacking Stove System Comparison Table

Mobile users rotate device for full width table view

Make/Model Price ($) Weight (oz) Heat Exchanger Pressure Reg Ignitor Capacity (L) Boil time 35F (sec) Fuel per boil 35F (g) Boil time 35F, 5mph wind (sec)
Fuel per boil 35F, 5mph wind (g)
SuperStove ** 118 10.2 yes yes yes 1.0 1.8 6.5 2.2 7.5
FrankenStove *** 235 8.5 yes yes yes 0.8 1.5 5.8 1.6 6.2
Jetboil Stash 150 7.1 yes no no 0.8 4.0 5.2 ∞* ∞*
Jetboil MiniMo 170 14.6 yes yes yes 1.0 2.0 5.7 4.0 7.9
TD Caldera 80 6.4 yes n/a no 0.9 8.3 14.4 10.0 17.6

Backpacking Stove Comparative Testing

Boil Testing SuperStove in 35F, 5mph wind

In addition to extensive backcountry experience with SuperStoves, we tested competing stoves with simulated real world conditions (i.e. a coolish morning with light winds that might commonly occur in a mountain camp), and recorded results against many other stove systems. See more on our testing methodology below.

No Boil Zone: The following stoves were unable to boil water.  JetBoil Flash unable to stay lit. These stoves reached steady state temps as follows — BRS 3000 only reached 52 F! ETEKCITY 95 F. JetBoil Stash 160F. Pocket Rocket Kit 190F

Best Backpacking Stove Systems

SuperStove msr pocket rocket deluxe with olicamp xts

SuperStove

SuperStove is our nickname for the combination of any pressure-regulated, wind-resistant burner (MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe or Soto WindMaster) with a top tier heat exchanger pot (such as Olicamp XTS), which create an extremely efficient system that outperforms 99.99% of competing stoves. A SuperStove boils water lightning fast, uses fuel hyper-efficiently, and is hardly affected by cold or wind. What’s more, you get all of that for just over $100 – a dead average pricetag for a complete stove system setup! Nothing else comes close in terms of performance or value. Learn SuperStoves in our comprehensive guide.

  • Price: $118
  • Weight: 10.2 oz (Olicamp XTS Pot, lid, MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe, stove bag)
  • Heat Exchanger: yes
  • Pressure Regulator: yes
  • Ignitor: yes
  • Capacity: 1,000ml
  • BTU Output: 10,400
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F: not tested
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel Use, 35F: not tested
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F 5mph wind: 2.0 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F 5mph Wind: 8.0 g

  • Pros: Optimal system. Very fast boil time. Very fuel efficient time. Performs excellently in cold wind. Great value. Perfect size.
  • Cons: Lighter and less bulky options exist. Marginally inferior only to FrankenStove.

Construction & Features

Starting from the bottom – our go-to SuperStove heats with an MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe. This burner is pressure regulated for performance in cold, features a cupped burner head design to prevent wind from blowing the flame out/away, and includes a built-in piezoelectric ignitor to speed up the cooking process. The MSR PRD’s arms fold away neatly when not in use, and the entire design feels well-made and long-lasting.

What makes the aluminum Olicamp XTS Pot special is that it’s designed with a heat exchanger base. This corrugated ring speeds up boil time by concentrating heat, decreases fuel use, and resists wind. The 1L chassis is a perfect volume capacity for 1-2 people, and cleanly nests small or medium sized fuel canisters. At 6.7, it’s not the lightest option, but you will recoup that weight via improved fuel economy. And for just $33, it’s an absolutely killer buy.

One way to crank the value proposition even higher is by substituting out the MSR Pocker Rocket Deluxe for a Soto WindMaster burner. This saves $15, offers approximately the same boil time and fuel economy, but adds a microdose of extra gear fiddling every time you want to set up the stove.

Verdict

The fact that SuperStove outperforms virtually all other systems on boil time, fuel economy, and weather resistance makes its modest ~$100 price tag an absolute value slam dunk. We earnestly believe that 99% of backpackers should choose a SuperStove 99% of the time.


FrankenStove

FrankenStove

FrankenStove combines the MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe Burner with a Jetboil Stash Pot to create the most optimal SuperStove possible, and the most effective backpacking stove to ever hit the backcountry. No other system boils water faster, few best its fuel economy, and FrankenStove even outperforms mountaineering-specific designs in cold, windy weather. It is marginally more effective than our default SuperStove configuration, but costs more than twice as much. Learn SuperStoves in our comprehensive guide.

  • Price: $235
  • Weight: 8.5 oz (Pot, lid, stove, stove bag)
  • Heat Exchanger: yes
  • Pressure Regulator: yes
  • Ignitor: yes
  • Capacity: 800 ml
  • BTU Output: 10,400
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F: 1.7 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel Use, 35F: 5.8g
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F 5mph wind: 1.6 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel Use, 35F 5mph Wind: 6.2 g

  • Pros: Fastest boil time. Excellent fuel economy. Lightweight and packable. Best performance in cold/wind. Rattle-proof.
  • Cons: Hazardous burner-pot combo according to manufacturer. Very expensive. Mainly for boiling, cooking requires great care. Only fits small canisters.

Construction & Features

The idea for FrankenStove was born on a whim out of obsessive testing and gear-hacker curiosity. Running each stove system through a gauntlet of cold/wind boil speed and fuel-usage tests, we determined that the MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe Burner, in combination with the pot from Jetboil Stash, was the most effective combination possible in challenging real world conditions. Here’s why:

To begin with, MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is a truly exceptional burner with all of the right features. Its high BTU output boils extremely quickly without sacrificing much in the way of fuel economy. It is pressure regulated, maintaining performance in cold temperatures and with nearly-empty canisters. The cupped head prevents flame from immediately blowing sideways or out in strong wind. The convenience of a built-in pietzoelectric ignitor speeds up the cooking process. And its user-friendly arms fold out to offer a well-balanced pot platform. Basically, everything about this design feels thoughtful and well-made. While MSR PRD is our team’s favorite, we acknowledge it to be functionally equal to and interchangeable with Soto WindMaster, another exceptionally high performing burner.

As much as we love the MSR PRD, the 5.1 oz aluminum Stash Pot shines even brighter, and is even more best-in-class. This pot is truly unequaled, and further separated from its peer group in terms of performance above replacement level. It’s 31% lighter than the second best pot – Olicamp XTS, and yielded a slightly faster boil time and slightly better fuel economy when tested on the same burner. And that’s to say nothing of how much better it is than a minimalist titanium model (way, way, way better). On top of that, the Stash Pot nests a 110g fuel canister upside down in its lid, which prevents rattling and also holds a lighter. Jetboil Stash Pot is the best backpacking cookware to have ever been designed.

All that said, there are downsides. First and foremost, the Jetboil Stash Pot is only approved for safe use with the Jetboil Stash Burner, a low BTU output unit. While we have yet to see this, it’s theoretically possible that the relative 2X heat output of MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe could damage the pot or the heat exchanger fins, and it definitely increases the likelihood of burning food on the bottom of the pot while cooking. See more in the safety warning below.

Furthermore, FrankenStove is very expensive. Assembling this combo requires purchasing the entire Stash System, only to chuck the burner and replace it with an MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe. The only stove system more expensive than FrankenStove is the MSR Reactor. One final and minor downside is that the MSR PRD is just enough larger than the Stash Burner that it cannot fit nested inside the pot alongside a canister.

Safety Warning

The Jetboil Stash Pot was designed exclusively for use with the Jetboil Stash Burner. Using the Jetboil Stash Pot with any other burner is hazardous, voids the warranty, risks product damage due to overheating, and personal injury. Please read Jetboil Stash System User Manual for more information about proper and safe handling of this cooking system and other risks associated with operating the stove. Anyone using the Stash Pot in any way other than exactly as intended by Jetboil acknowledges the risks they are taking, and is wholly responsible for their own actions and safety. Please refer to our terms and conditions of service for more information about use of this website and the content therein.

Verdict

FrankenStove is lightweight, highly packable, fuel-efficient, and boils water faster than any other stove system. It is so effective in cold and wind that it even outperforms mountaineering all-in-one stoves. For all of the above reasons, FrankenStove is our editor’s choice award winner for being the most effective stove system possible. However, it is highly expensive, and combines two products that were not meant to be combined in a way that the manufacturer considers to be hazardous. Proceed with caution!


Jetboil Stash Stove

Jetboil Stash Cooking System

Ah Jetboil Stash Stove, the most compact, lightweight and efficient all-in-one cooking system for use in moderate, or fair weather conditions. This game changing stove systems delivers best-in-class packability and fuel economy, and comes with the all-time most efficient cookpot.

  • Price: $150
  • Weight: 7.1 oz (pot, lid, stove, stove bag)
  • Heat Exchanger: yes
  • Pressure Regulator: no
  • Ignitor: no
  • Capacity: 800 ml
  • BTU Output: 4,500
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F: 4.0 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F: 5.2 g
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F 5mph wind: unable to boil
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F 5mph Wind: unable to boil

  • Pros: Ultralight. Best fuel economy possible in fair weather. Packs down and nests very nicely. Best pot ever to be designed. Rattle-proof.
  • Cons: Unable to boil in cold wind. Slow boil time. Not pressure regulated. Burner head not sufficiently cupped. Expensive. Only nests small fuel canisters.

Construction & Features

The Jetboil Stash Stove is an ultralight backpacker’s dream. The whole system weighs just over seven ounces, including stove, small fuel canister, and lighter. It packs down and nests in its own pot – all without rattling. In-use, Stash is something of a best-of-both-worlds hybrid between traditional Jetboil integrated systems (like the Flash) and standalone canister-top backpacking stove (like MSR Pocket Rocket).

What’s more Stash reigns supreme when it comes to fuel economy in wind-free conditions. Our half-liter boil test at 35F used a scant 5.2g of fuel with the average being somewhere around 8g. This is due in part to a boost from the pot’s heat exchanger base, but also the burner’s low BTU output. Lower BTU burners improves fuel efficiency at the cost of slower boil times. But in most scenarios, fuel economy is king, and we don’t mind waiting an extra minute or two.

The 5.1 oz aluminum pot is constructed with Jetboil’s signature Flux Ring heat exchanger. This technology blocks wind and concentrates heat, both of which yield faster boil times and superior fuel economy. What’s more, notches on the stove arms create a very secure perch for the pot to roost. The siliconized pot handle flips open and closes down overtop, locking the lid in place while stowed. The plastic lid is molded to nest an upside down fuel canister, locking it in place to prevent rattling. And finally, the gap between the underside of the canister and the lid holds a mini lighter in place. What an incredible design!

If Jetboil Stash has a weakness and/or opportunity for improvement, it would be performance in cold and wind. The burner unit is not pressure regulated, meaning heat output decreases as temperatures drop and/or the canister empties. What’s more, it does not have a sufficiently cupped burner head, allowing precious gas to drift off as soon as it becomes flame. Finally, the low BTU output means that the stove can’t be cranked up to compensate for cold weather/strong wind/high altitude. While perfectly sufficient for 90% of 3-season conditions, we would not recommend the Jetboil Stash System for use in shoulder season or if the forecast calls for cold and/or strong wind.

Verdict

Simply put, Jetboil Stash is the most economical stove possible when it comes to weight savings, packability, and fuel efficiency in moderate to fair weather usage. And it includes the best pot ever to have been designed. However, we recommend other backpacking stove systems for use in cold, windy, or otherwise challenging conditions. Read more in our full length review.

jetboil minimo stove

Jetboil MiniMo Cooking System

For use in cold, windy conditions, the Jetboil MiniMo is our all-in-one system of choice – though still slightly inferior to multi-component custom systems like a SuperStove. We’ve had great experiences cooking on MiniMo in Patagonia, famous for its intensely windy weather.

  • Price: $170
  • Weight: 14.6 oz (pot, lid, stove)
  • Heat Exchanger: yes
  • Pressure Regulator: yes
  • Ignitor: yes
  • Capacity: 1000 ml
  • BTU Output: 6,000
  • Wind Tolerance: High
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F 5mph Wind: 2.0 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F 5mph Wind:  5.7 g
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F 5mph Wind: 4.0 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F 5mph Wind:  7.9g

  • Pros: Performs great in wind and cold. Fuel efficient. Comes with pot. Super stable — can’t knock pot of burner. Insulated koozie. Wide pot is easy to clean and eat out of. Reasonably fast boil.
  • Cons: Heavy. Expensive. Bulky. Customized SuperStove systems perform slightly better.

Construction & Features

The Jetboil MiniMo is the best pre-made, all-in-one, fully integrated stove system for use in challenging weather. This is thanks to its pressure regulator, FluxRing heat exchanger, and overall excellent fuel economy.

Fully-integrated backpacking stoves are always bulkier and heavier than standalones or hybrids, which is why we only use them when necessary. That said, MiniMo does a good job of minimizing this downside. Everything packs down into the pot and the whole system weighs less than a pound. However, that is about twice as heavy as Jetboil Stash or and 50% heavier than a SuperStove.

The Jetboil pressure regulator is a critical benefit in that it allows the stove to perform in cold temperatures when others would falter and reduce heat output. The same is true when using a nearly empty canister. Pressure regulators are of huge benefit to stoves, and well worth a bit of extra weight and cost. Jetboil claims MiniMo can perform in temps down to 20.

In our testing, Jetboil MiniMo boiled water quickly and easily in cold windy, bested only by FrankenStove, SuperStove, and its slightly bulkier, heavier, and much more expensive peer – the MSR Reactor.

With MiniMo, you’re getting a conveniently short and wide 1L sized cook pot. It can even store a 230g fuel canister! It is wide and excellent for cooking and eating out of. However, if you will always be cooking solo and mostly not eating out of the pot, it might make sense to instead choose it’s slightly smaller sibling, the Jetboil MicroMo backpacking stove. MicroMo weighs two ounces less and has a narrower, 0.8L sized pot.

Verdict

The Jetboil MiniMo Stove is the best blend of price, effectiveness in cold/wind, weight/bulk minimization, and fuel economy among all-in-one system. That being said, it is too heavy to be considered for use as a daily driver, and slightly less effective than a SuperStove. But if you love an all-in-one, go for the MiniMo.

Trail designs complete sidewinder backpacking stove system

Trail Designs Sidewinder Ti-Tri Caldera

Thanks to its titanium heat trapping/wind blocking cone, the Trail Designs Sidewinder Ti-Tri is the most effective alcohol fuel stove available. It is a bit finicky to set up and much slower to boil than canister stoves, but lighter weight after factoring in fuel for use on shorter trips. The heat concentrating cone also yields faster boils times and better fuel economy than other alcohol stoves.

  • Price: $80
  • Trail Weight (full system with pot): 6.4 oz
  • Includes: Stove, 900 ml Titanium Pot, Cone, Sleeve, Stakes, Empty Fuel Bottle
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F: 8.3 min
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F: 14.4 g
  • Tested .5L Boil Time, 35F, 5 mph wind: 10 minutes
  • Tested .5L Boil Fuel-Use, 35F, 5 mph Wind: 17.6g
  • Wind Tolerance: Moderate

  • Pros: Ultralight. No metal fuel canister. Wind resistant. Stable. Pot Included. Alcohol fuel is cheap and easy to get.
  • Cons: Very finicky setup. Slow boil time. Heavy liquid fuel.

Pros & cons of alcohol stoves

There are advantages and disadvantages when it comes to alcohol stoves, which we will summarize before diving into specifics of the Trail Designs Sidewinder Ti-Tri.

The primary advantage is that alcohol stoves do not require the 3.5 oz weight and bulk of a metal fuel canister, which immediately saves 2.7 oz compared to a 0.8 oz plastic alcohol fuel bottle. This alcohol stove system with fuel for 2-3 days weighs 9-10 oz, which is a few ounces lighter than a canister stove system with fuel for 2-3 days.

The disadvantages are significantly slower boil times, a more finnicky setup, and the fact that alcohol fuel itself is heavier than isobutane. This means that the relative savings from the canister are lost the more fuel you require. When factoring in fuel weight, alcohol stoves are only lighter on short trips. There is a transition point somewhere after the three day mark when canister stoves start to become the lighter weight system.

Construction & Features

The most noteworthy feature of this backpacking stove is the titanium Sidewinder Cone, which creates an effect similar to heat exchangers. Each cone is manufactured to match the exact dimensions of your pot which seals off gaps. This creates a nearly windproof air chamber that traps heat below the pot for increased heat efficiency. The pot itself sits atop two stakes running perpendicular to the cone. It’s a bit of a chore to set up, but easy once you get the hang of it.

The Kojin alcohol stove is reminiscent of cat food cans of yore, only filled with a spongy material to prevent flaming alcohol from spilling if it were knocked over. If you’ve ever knocked over a flaming cat can before, you know how important this is. Put the lid on to snuff the flame and save excess fuel.

Verdict

The Trail Designs Sidewinder Ti-Tri is far and away the best alcohol stove, but alcohol stoves in general have mostly been edged out by increasingly efficient and more user-friendly canister-based backpacking stoves. As such, we only recommend this to ultralight alcohol stove buffs, and/or those looking to carry the least possible weight on short trips.

Best Backpacking Stove Components

MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe

MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe

The MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is our preferred stove burner. It is fully featured, beautifully made, highly effective in both testing and the backcountry, and has only one equal on the market – Soto WindMaster.

  • Price: $85
  • Stove Weight: 2.9 oz
  • BTUs: 10,400
  • Pietzo Ignitor: Yes
  • Pressure Regulator: Yes
  • Wind Tolerance: High
  • Pros: Lightweight. Fast boil. Good fuel economy. Wind resistant. Pressure Regulated. Good arms. Ignitor. High BTU output.
  • Cons: Expensive. Slightly lighter and more fuel efficient models exist.

Construction & Features

To begin with, MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is a truly exceptional burner with all of the right features. Its high BTU output boils extremely quickly without sacrificing much in the way of fuel economy. If you want to save fuel, use it at 25-50% output.

It is pressure regulated, maintaining performance in cold temperatures and with nearly-empty canisters. The cupped head prevents flame from immediately blowing sideways or out in strong wind. The convenience of a built-in piezoelectric ignitor makes the cooking process even faster. And the user-friendly arms fold out to offer a ridged, well-balanced pot platform. Basically, everything about this design feels thoughtful and well-made.

While MSR PRD is our team’s favorite, we acknowledge it to be functionally equal to Soto WindMaster, another exceptionally high performing burner.

Verdict

MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe is one of the two best backpacking stove burners. It has all of the right features, and exceptional backcountry performance in all conditions, and is our current go-to.

soto windmaster stove

Soto WindMaster

The Soto WindMaster is one of the two best backpacking stove burners. It is highly rated, extremely effective in all weather, and built with all of the right features. Its performance rivals our staff pick MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe in virtually every way, but is a bit cheaper and there are some minor differences.

  • Price: $70
  • Stove Weight: 3.1 oz (with 4-Flex arms)
  • BTUs: 11,000
  • Pietzo Ignitor: Yes
  • Pressure Regulator: Yes
  • Wind Tolerance: High
  • Pros: Lightweight. Fast boil. Good fuel economy. Wind resistant. Good arm balance. Good value.
  • Cons: Somewhat finnicky stove arms. Slightly lighter and more fuel efficient models exist.

Construction & Features

Like the MSR PRD, Soto Wind Master has all of the right features and delivers exceptional backcountry performance. Its fuel pressure regulator improves performance in cold, and allows the stove to continue operating at near max until empty. The high BTU output yields exceptionally fast boil times in all conditions, and can also be cranked back when you wish to prioritize fuel economy over speed.

Its namesake wind mastery is due to the cupped burner head (since replicated by MSR PRD), which prevents the flame from being blown out and heat from drifting away. SWM also features a piezoelectric ignitor which further speeds up the start-to-finish cooking process.

Apart from being $15 less expensive than MSR PRD, where this design differs most is the modular arm system. In storage, the arms fold away and separate from the stove body. This makes it a bit easier to store, but a bit more work to assemble for use at camp. Two options are available, known as 4-Flex, and TriFlex.

Verdict

Soto WindMaster is one of the two best backpacking stove burners, has all of the right features, and exceptional backcountry performance in all conditions, and is equal in virtually every way to our top pick, the MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe.

OliCamp XTS Pot

Olicamp XTS Pot

The Olicamp XTS is the best standalone pot, and easily the best buy. For just $33, it’s a killer deal on a great product that isn’t even strictly worse than our editor’s choice pick (Jetboil Stash) if you prefer the extra volume and/or don’t want to ignore manufacturer burner-compatibility instructions. Olicamp XTS features a heat exchanger ring for added wind resistance and heat transfer, siliconized handle grips, and it can even nest a full eight oz fuel canister. This a great pot for a great price. Biggest downside is the weight and bulk. At 6.7 ounces, it’s just barely lightweight. But everything else about it gets an A grade.

  • Price: $33
  • Weight: 6.7 oz
  • Volume: 1000 ml
  • Material: Aluminum
  • Nests: 8 oz fuel canister
  • Features: Heat exchanger ring. Siliconized handle. Lid with pour hole and snap fit.
  • Pros: Very affordable. Heat exchanger increases stove’s fuel efficiency and wind resistance. Thermally efficient. Perfect size. Nests medium canisters.
  • Cons: Upper end of lightweight. Bulkier than average. Lid could be better/more secure.
Jetboil Stash backpacking pot

Jetboil Stash Pot

Choose the backpacking pot from the Jetboil Stash System because it offers the best blend backcountry performance, weight minimization, features, wind-resistance, and decreased boil time. Thanks to the heat exchanger ring affixed to its base, Stash is one of the only pots that actually increases your stove’s fuel economy and wind resistance. While slightly heavier than its titanium peers, the aluminum chassis performs better when it comes to heat transfer from flame to water. What’s more, you get a siliconized handle that flips up to secure the lid in place. And when nested, the pot lid holds a four ounce fuel canister and lighter without rattling around.

However, there are downsides. First and foremost, Jetboil only sells this unit as a pot-stove combo package; while the pot is best-in-class, the stove unit is only highly effective in moderate to fair weather. If you already have a top tier stove, like our top pick the Pocket Rocket Deluxe, acquiring the Stash Pot means wasting money on a stove you don’t need or want. What’s more, due to its aluminum construction and the added weight of a heat exchanger, Stash pot weighs about 20% more than a minimalist titanium pot. Also, it’s so effective at heat transfer that Stash pot increases the likelihood of burning food on the bottom inside if used for cooking, rather than just boiling water. Lastly, at 800 ml, it’s just a smidge smaller than our preferred 1L bullseye, but still within the healthy range for 1-2p.

Safety Warning: The Jetboil Stash Pot was designed exclusively for use with the Jetboil Stash Burner. Using the Jetboil Stash Pot with any other burner is hazardous, voids the warranty, risks product damage due to overheating, and personal injury. Please read Jetboil Stash System User Manual for more information about proper and safe handling. You are responsible for your own safety.

  • Price: $150
  • Weight: 5.1
  • Volume: 800 ml
  • Material: Aluminum
  • Features: Heat exchanger base ring, siliconized handle, fuel canister and lighter nesting lid. Lid with pour hole and snap fit.
  • Nests: 4 oz fuel canister
  • Pros: Lightweight. Increases stove’s fuel efficiency and wind resistance. Nests beautifully. Thermally efficient. Quiet and does not rattle.
  • Cons: Requires purchasing expensive stove/pot bundle. Aluminum is heavier than titanium. A bit small. Better for boiling water than cooking food.
TOAKS Titanium 900ml pot

TOAKS Titanium D115

The TOAKS Titanium D115 is our top overall pick titanium pot because it offers the best blend of low weight, low price, and high user reviews. This is what we bring if we aren’t using a heat exchanger model, though that rarely ever happens.

  • Price: $45
  • Weight: 4.0
  • Volume: 900 ml
  • Material: Titanium
  • Features: Fold out handle.
  • Nests: 8 oz fuel canister
  • Pros: Ultralight. Highly rated. Simple. Affordable. Effective. Extended handles.
  • Cons: Insecure lid. Lid grip is not siliconized. Handles can get hot. Storage bag sheds fiber.

Construction & Features

It is minimalist and simple, yet highly effective. Perhaps the only thing we’d change is siliconizing its handles and lid grip. But aside from that, TOAKS knocked this one out of the park. Such a classic ultralight pot!

Note, the namesake D115 refers to the pot’s diameter in millimeters. The 130mm diameter version used to be more popular, but always earned significantly lower user reviews due to flimsier walls (larger diameter circles are less structurally sound) and very few retailers still stock it. That said, we actually preferred the wider version for being easier to eat out of and clean, and having better heat transfer. But the people have voted with their dollars and prefer the D115. So we recommend it here.

Verdict

While we now prefer aluminum heat exchanger pots over minimalist titanium designs due to the way in which they improve boil time and fuel economy, TOAKS D115 is the best titanium option. It is a great ultralight pot to choose for short trips when fuel savings won’t surpass the weight differential between an aluminum pot vs a titanium pot.

close up on frankenstove SuperStove backpacking stove with heat exchanger base

Best Backpacking Stove Pro Tips & Buyer Info

What is a SuperStove?

A SuperStove is the combination of a heat exchanger pot (e.g. Olicamp XTS), with a wind resistant (cupped head) and pressure regulated burner (e.g. MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe). A SuperStove outperforms all other stove types in all conditions by a large margin. Key performance improvements are 1) it has exceptionally fast boil times, 2) is highly fuel efficient, and most importantly 3) cold and wind have very little effect on its measurable performance (boil times and fuel efficiency). The vast majority of conventional backcountry stoves choke in cold and wind — many not able to boil water at all. Learn more about SuperStoves in our comprehensive guide.

Criteria For Choosing A Backpacking Stove Burner

  1. Fuel Efficient (very important)
  2. Weighs 2-3 oz (very important)
  3. At least 3 arms, fold down for storage (very important)
  4. Pressure Regulated (very important in cold)
  5. Cupper burner head (very important in wind)
  6. Boils Quickly (important)
  7. High BTU output (important)
  8. Output ranging from simmer to full blast (important for cooking)
  9. Titanium construction (nice to have)
  10. Piezoelectric Ignitor (nice to have)
  11. Four arms (nice to have)

How To Choose A Backpacking Pot For Your Backpacking Stove

What follows are our recommendations for choosing a pot to pair with your stove. See more in our guide to the best backpacking pots.

  • Approximate capacity of 0.8-1.0 liters, best all-around size for 1-2 backpackers
  • Weighs 4-7 oz, nests fuel canister, fold-out handle, siliconized grip
  • First Choice: aluminum body with heat exchanger. Improves boil time, fuel economy, blocks wind. Best all around
  • Second Choice: titanium body minimizes weight, maximizes durability. Best for very short, fair weather trips
  • Third Choice: aluminum body, no heat exchanger, 1.3L. Best for in-pot gourmet cooking for 2P, least likely to burn food

Cold Weather Usage Tips For Isobutane Fuel Canisters

When you see canister fuel advertised as “4 season,” take it with a grain of salt. There is no way to get around vapor pressure, and pressure regulated stoves can only do so much. This kind of fuel may have slightly higher propane levels that will burn off first, but it is not cold-resistant. When it’s cold, the best way to burn your fuel most efficiently in the backcountry is to baby it. 

When walking all day, store the fuel canister up against your lumbar in your pack. This way, your body temperature can trap some heat inside your pack and help keep the canister warmer. Don’t store it in any external or pockets. As soon as you arrive in camp, put your canister in your puffy jacket or another insulating layer to warm it up before cooking. When it comes time to cook, put the fuel canister in shallow, 32+ degree water to keep the temperature right at freezing. You’ll get optimal performance and efficiency this way. 

At bedtime, slip the fuel canister into your sleeping bag. It might not be the most comfortable snuggle buddy, but it will save you time heating up water for your morning coffee or tea. Create or find your own windscreen to protect the burner from wind — e.g. shelter the stove behind natural objects, such as logs and rocks. But be very careful not to contain/concentrate heat around the stove’s fuel canister, e.g. a ring of aluminum foil. That’s a big safety hazard and all stove manufacturers have huge warnings NOT to do this.

Liquid Feed, Inverted Canister Backpacking Stove Systems

In really cold conditions, an inverted feed stove like this Soto Fusion Trek performs wonderfully. The inverted liquid feed takes vapor pressure out of the equation, and because the burner is separated from the pot by a feed line, you can put a full windscreen around the burner without risk of overheating the canister.

Pot Size Relative to Group Size

For optimal group camping, we find it best to have one complete stove system for every two backpackers. This speeds up the cooking process when everyone is hungry at dinner time, adds redundancy, and reduces collective gear bulk (in the sense that it’s more space-efficient to pack two 1L pots than one 2L pot). However, some situations may require deviating from this logic, such as complex menus, odd numbered groups, or a disproportionate ratio of children to adults.

Recommended pot size relative to group size

  • 800 ml capacity – Optimal for 1p-use, acceptable for 2p-use
  • 1000 ml capacity – Optimal for mixed 1-2p use
  • 1300 ml capacity – Optimal for exactly 2p use
  • 2000 ml capacity – Optimal for 3-4p use*

*Better to bring two stoves and two 1L pots, but some situations/group dynamics/menus may warrant a larger pot.

Titanium Pot vs Aluminum Pot For Use With A Backpacking Stove

Both materials have their merits, and neither is strictly better than the other.

  • Pros of aluminum: Accommodates heat exchanger base. Lightweight. Durable. Affordable. Good heat transfer. Even heat distribution. Better for cooking. Our first choice.
  • Cons of aluminum: Heavier and less durable than titanium – but still light and durable in the grand scheme of things.
  • Pros of titanium: Ultralight. Very Durable.
  • Cons of titanium: Does not accommodate heat exchanger base. Expensive. Poor heat transfer, uneven heat distribution. Our second choice.

Aluminum Pot with Heat Exchanger vs Titanium Pot Without Heat Exchanger

In cold and windy weather, we always recommend bringing a pot with a heat exchanger base. However, in warm, calm, and otherwise fair conditions, the weight savings of a minimalist ultralight titanium pot could be more advantageous and desirable than the thermal efficiency of an aluminum heat exchanger base pot. Based on our testing, a heat exchanger base saves 0.2 oz of fuel for each pint of water boiled compared to a minimalist titanium pot. So depending on the length of your trip and how much cooking you intend to do, a heavier pot with heat exchanger could save weight, even if the pot body is 2-3 ounces heavier to start with. But for short trips (2-3 days) in fair weather, an ultralight titanium pot is slightly more weight efficient even after accounting for reduced fuel economy.

jetboil stash backpacking stove system

Best Backpacking Stove Test Data & Methodology

In addition to extensive experience testing stoves in the backcountry, we also tested them in a controlled environment at home which simulated challenging real world conditions. We used the following methodology:

  • Outside in 35F/1.5C temperatures
  • Tested with and without 5 mph wind made by box fan, measured with an anemometer
  • At sea level
  • Stoves turned to max heat output
  • Boiling 16 oz/.5L of water
  • Measured time to reach 212F/100C, same thermometer each time.
  • Weighed fuel canister before and after each boil test to record fuel expenditure. Scale accurate to 0.01 g.

Note: FrankenStove’s measured boil time decreased in wind test due to minor variances in real world testing, margin of error, decimal rounding, and FrankenStove’s inherently excellent wind resistance.

Stove Test Data, 35F No Wind
Boil Testing SuperStove in 35F, 5mph wind

No Boil Zone: The following stoves were unable to boil water. JetBoil Flash unable to stay lit. These stoves reached steady state temps as follows — BRS 3000 only reached 52 F! ETEKCITY 95 F. JetBoil Stash 160F. Pocket Rocket Kit 190F

FrankenStove SuperStove

Best Backpacking Stove Conclusion

Thank you for reading this guide to the best backpacking stove, where we hope you found your next backcountry cooking system. We’re absolutely confident that we have identified the best and most efficient stoves on the market for boiling water and basic food prep. In summary, we recommend assembling a SuperStove, which means pairing a heat exchanger pot with a pressure regulated, cupped-head burner for optimal fuel economy, boil time, and weather-resistance. Happy hiking, happy camping, and bon apetite!

47 replies
  1. Brent
    Brent says:

    Alan-

    Since this was written, another factor to consider, is that there has been some changing views on the fire dangers of alcohol stoves and the fact that they may not even be permitted in some areas. It’s tough to balance with the canister stove recycling issues vs the increased wild fire dangers and prohibition of non canister stove systems. Seems like a topic that should be included in the discussion when you update this page. Also, for UL cooking systems, it seems like the canister/BRS3000 and homemade wind protection (like a sit pad or finding a spot with rocks/trees) has become the gold standard vs the Jetboil. BRS Stove 0.88oz, Toaks 550 mL pot w no handle 1.5oz, DIY foil lid 0.1oz , 4 oz fuel canister 7.4oz, pot grabber–use buff or gloves, wind protection 0 oz for a total of 9.88 oz which allows easy boiling of water for re-hydrating meals. Thanks for all the great info on your site!

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Sorry for the late reply Brent. Yes, with hotter summers and more fires in the West, Parks are going to look at ways to reduce fire hazards from backpacking stoves, no doubt! But FWIW I don’t think that the Kojin, TD is any more of a fire risk than a canister stove. Case in point, I know that SEIKI that has very strict fire restrictions but does allow alcohol stoves. They consider them in the same category and canister stoves. And FWIW the Kojin stove can be put out just as easily as a canister stove. You can blow it out like a birthday candle and cap it, essentially reducing it to a non-burning fuel container no different than a canister stove. And once the fuel is in the stove, even uncapped it will not spill. That being said, you must ALWAYS comply with park regulations.

      As to your BRS system, it does some disadvantages vs. the Jetboil or the TD Caldera. 1) it lacks a heat exchanger so not as fuel efficient. 2) the pot can easily be knocked off the stove. 3) the 550 ml pot is quite limiting both in the amount of water you can boil and it is hard to simmer or cook a meal in the pot as their isn’t sufficient volume to contain the food and stir. In comparison, I can easily cook for my wife and I in the 900 ml Toaks TD Calera system. But to each their own. Wishing you a great year of trekking. Best, -alan

      Best, -alan

      Reply
  2. Randy Clark
    Randy Clark says:

    Hi Alan,
    My brother and I are walking for 6 days on the AT the last week of October. How much alcohol fuel would you take for trip of this length? I am thinking 14-16 oz..
    I have a homemade kit weighs 10oz, I use a zelph stove. I also thinking of using my pocket rocket with a small canister kit weighs 14 oz..
    Thank you for your Help,

    Randy

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Randy sorry for the late reply. Have been out guiding for the last few weeks. My rule of thumb is about 0.5 fl oz of alcohol for every pint boiled in my Trail Designs Caldera System. That being said, it could be cold in Oct so some margin over this would be prudent. And remember that if you are doing “hot” drinks like hot chocolate at night or Via in the morning you can use treated water and only heat to 130-140F. That will save you some fuel. Wishing you a great trip. Warmest, -alan

      Reply
  3. Thorsten
    Thorsten says:

    Awesome info here, thanks so much for putting it together!
    What I’m a bit lost about is:
    – how do the trade-offs change when cooking for two, and heating up 1qt in a GSI tea kettle, for example. Does that take forever in a caldera cone?
    – is it at all feasible to saute something on an alcohol stove, or does it only really work if everything is well closed? And the diameters of the cone&pot/pan/kettle are perfectly matched?
    – I see that TD has simmer rings for the 12-10, do they work and are they worth it?

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Hi Thorsten, good questions. Here are some responses

      1. First, Alison and I use a 0.9L Toaks pot on the Caldera using the new Kojin stove. It does everything we need it to do. We have no issues cooking dinner on it or boiling water for coffee in the morning. Boil amounts range from 500 ml to around 800 ml. Since the pot can be set to boil unattended, we are doing camp chores while the water gets hot. As such, a 6-10 minute boil time is not an issue.
      2. Calderas are always matched exactly to the diameter of the pot. And altho we never simmer for an extended period with any pot, we occasionally do simmer for a few minutes to fully hydrate a meal. In this case you do need to keep stirring so that food doesn’t stick to the pot bottom. Given this, I would guess you could manage a simmer for a while assuming that stir continuously.
      3. I have never used the simmer ring on the 12-10 but have faith in the folks at TD. If they make a simmer ring then it likely works.

      Finally, I am just wondering what your interest in simmering is. For the most part, people interested in ultralight stove systems are usually interested in boiling water and either do cook-in-bag meals, or like Alison and I might do a 1-2 minutes simmer after boiling to complete hydration. That is, these ultralight systems are not designed with gourmet trail cooking as a first priority.

      Hope this helps, Warmest, -alan

      Reply
      • Thorsten
        Thorsten says:

        > I am just wondering what your interest in simmering is.
        Good question! Wanting to pack light doesn’t necessarily mean one has little time to cook. I was thinking about a risotto, for example. It’s light, easy, tasty. Also, it can be nice to stir the pot for 30 minutes while it cooks. But I assume the real issue it the fuel weight this adds.

        I’ve been reading more about the fire restrictions in California and that is seriously dampening my excitement about alcohol stoves, sigh.

        Reply
  4. Rob Moon
    Rob Moon says:

    I think better gas options have become avaliable since this was written, the msr wind burner for example has a regulated burner and is as impervious to wind as the caldera (I own both).

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Yes Rob, there have been impovements. And yes, I intend to update this with some of the better options. But note that none of the canister stoves (even the best ones) will be as light as an alcohol stove. Warmest -alan

      Reply
  5. Randy Clark
    Randy Clark says:

    Thanks Alan the wood thing looks like more time and work. I have a small light weight alcohol kit that works great.

    Randy

    Reply
  6. Randy Clark
    Randy Clark says:

    Alan,
    Really like your website! I have used your advice a lot, my pack is so much better.
    I have done some research on the solo stove and was wondering your thoughts on using a wood burning stove?
    Thank you
    Randy

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Hi Randy, excellent Q. For me, wood burning stoves just take too much time — time I’d rather spend on other things. You have to find small pieces of wood, then likely break them into smaller pieces, and then feed them into the stove over time. I guide clients with stoves like this and I’ve eaten my dinner and washed up by the time they finally get enough of a fire going to put their pot on the top of the stove. And weight savings is negligible vs. an alcohol stove on most trips. Finally, most of the places I like to backpack have a ban of fires which includes wood burning stoves. That being said, I know some people who immensely enjoy the fire thing and are more than happy to dedicate some time to it. So if fires aren’t banned, then by all means have some fun with a small wood burning stove. Wishing you a great year of hiking. Warmest, -alan

      Reply
  7. Gary
    Gary says:

    I think the best feature of the cone, if its titanium, is the ability to burn wood if out of alcohol.
    Best feature of an alcohol stove is, IMO, the easy of finding fuel. Drug store, grocery store, hardware store, camping store.

    Reply
  8. Chris Miles
    Chris Miles says:

    Ditto on the compliments for the great site. I also have a range of stoves and vary depending on the trip and companions, including trips with my children where I might do more ‘interesting’ food. I find I often use the Solti pot with the newer Jetboil stove that has the regulator, but have swapped the cup for a Toaks 400 ml cup that fits on the bottom of the stove – I can have coffee in this while meals are cooking, or more water is on the boil for freezer bag cooking. I think I read somewhere that the Evernew cup fits a little better. If travelling with one of my children, they might have a small titanium frypan to eat out of but also to offer options like omelette in the morning. Of course, all of these are options with wood, alcohol or Esbit stoves but I must admit if carrying the kids gear I usually have less energy to ‘fiddle’ with cooking. I find that the choice of meals for a trip and how many are being cooked for directly influences cookware, but also inevitably the stove option . In any case, it is important to consider that any additional participants in the meals should add flexibility to cooking options by using additional cookware options where appropriate, rather than just eating. Of course those options must fit with the stove choice and other requirements such as expected fuel usage and environmental considerations such as weather, shelter and altitude to cook your meals. I think you have successfully pointed out that there is no one size fits all approach.

    Reply
  9. John Walker
    John Walker says:

    Great site and info Alan. Been running with a Vargo Decagon titanium alcohol since 2009 and have never looked back. In my youth (I started this adventure in 1967 on the Appalachian Trail) it was a good old camp fire but I eventually graduated in high school to a SEVA 123 which at the time was the cats meow. Later it was the new MSR whisperlite international stove because I like the option of not only burning white gas i.e. coleman fuel but in a pinch could use unleaded gasoline or kerosene. Never fancied the canister fuel option because of the half spent can dilemma and the hassle of disposing of the expired cans (HAZMAT) so I have steered away from that option. Generally speaking denatured alcohol is readily available in just about town with a hardware store and in a pinch I have used isopropyl alcohol but I don’t recommend this because of the lack of BTU’s generated using isopropyl vs. denatured. Takes forever just to warm, not boil, warm up a coffee mug of water. Keep up the good work and thanks for sharing your wisdom and vast knowledge. Swagman

    Reply
  10. Mike Kelly
    Mike Kelly says:

    The Caldera Cone System comes with the 12-10 stove. If I go with your suggestion to use the Zelph StarLyte instead, any thoughts on what to do with the 12-10? Or can I save a few bucks and keep the 12-10? This will be my first alcohol stove, so I don’t have a reference point. Thanks for your advice.

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      The 12-10 is faster, so I would probably hang on to it for times when you want a quicker boil. And to make sure, you are getting the standard Starlite with the larger burner area, yes? Enjoy your new cooking setup. -a

      Reply
  11. Will
    Will says:

    Do you find that fire restrictions affect your use of an alcohol stove? I am trying to decide whether to buy a Caldera or a Jetboil. Coming from Southern California where there is ongoing drought, it seems that alcohol stoves are not permitted in many forest areas. Per the PCTA website (http://www.pcta.org/discover-the-trail/backcountry-basics/fire/) it looks like many fire restrictions are much more lenient towards canister stoves.

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Will, you are correct, fire restrictions are much kinder to canister stoves. The most conservative choice if you are buying only one stove, would be a canister stove like the JetBoil. I have both types. The TD alcohol stove is my first choice, but I sometimes have a canister stove as a backup in the car in case of last minute reg changes. That being said, there are far more times when I get to use the alcohol stove. Have a great hiking season, -alan

      Reply
  12. Dr. T Bear
    Dr. T Bear says:

    I always leave out with a full can and save the partial full can for car camping. Some through hikers on tight budgets appreciate these as donations. Avoid leaving very empty cans in donation because this is more of a problem than a help. Please be considerate.

    Reply
  13. DK
    DK says:

    Here’s a solution for the half full canister issue:
    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00ULA45JG/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Sounds like a good idea. Only comment is that the propane usually burns of faster than the butane. So guessing that after a few transfers you’ll have mostly butane and little or no propane. Not the end of the world.

      But having only butane fuel (rather than a Propane/butane mix) does have cold weather implications since Propane with its higher vapor pressure is the fuel of choice in cold Wx. The only reason is that backpacking canisters are not all Propane is that the strength/weight of a canister to contain 100% Propane (much higher vapor pressure) would be way too heavy to take backpacking. Weigh a 100% Propane fuel canister and you’ll see what I mean. Best, -alan

      Reply
      • jt
        jt says:

        Hi Allen! I’ve been using the refill adapter for years with never a problem or complaint. It takes less than 10 minutes to pull the gear from it’s storage space, fill a can as needed (easy to use a scale and fill only what I need for a specific trip) and put it all away. A definite must for any canister stove user. Since the can doing the filling is inverted and draining liquid fuel, I wonder if the gas separation is an issue?
        P.S. I’m a huge fan of your site, it’s the first place I point folks to when they have backpacking questions. Thank you!

        Reply
  14. Damon
    Damon says:

    A great competitor to the JetBoil is MSR’s WindBurner. It’s essentially the same weight, does MUCH better in the wind, boils faster, holds heat longer, and has an overall “built well feel”. Having used both, I’m sold on the WindBurner.

    As for the canisters… It’s probably not the best UL thing to do, but I’ll typically bring 2 canisters when I know one is close to empty. I record the weight after every trip in marker so I have a pretty good idea how much fuel per day I’m using and whether said canister needs a backup. Once empty, the crush-it key from JetBoil works like a charm.

    Reply
  15. Marco
    Marco says:

    Alan, I have and use both. (Caldera Cone/Kmart Grease pot ~7oz, Jetboil Sol Aluminum ~10oz) For short two and three day trips, I prefer the alcohol stove. For 4-5 day trips it really doesn’t matter. For up to 11-12 day trips I usually bring a canister. This is the max I can go on one 230gm canister. For longer, I go with an old WG stove that weighs about 17oz. I agree completely, half full canisters are NO fun.

    Reply
  16. Tom Darden
    Tom Darden says:

    The Caldera sheet metal cone is nicely designed but has sharp edges which could cut you or cut fabric. Spend 3 minutes sanding the edges with medium grit sandpaper and it will make it much smoother.

    Reply
  17. Don
    Don says:

    A point of clarification: the Jetboil Sol Ti is still available on Amazon even though it’s been discontinued by the manufacturer. The melting issues as I understand were occurring because people would start the stove without first filling it with water! Very silly to do with any stove but with titanium the abrupt expansive forces will snap the fins off of the base. It’s unfortunate when good (in this case great) products are dropped because people don’t use them properly.

    Without the legs and soup cup (both unnecessary) mine is in the 8 oz range (plus fuel). I used to carry a fancy feast alcohol stove but have found that the Jetboil system with canisters actually weighs less on trips of more than three days due to the much energy density of isopropyl. That and I can boil ~3-4 cups of water in the same time as 1 using alcohol.

    +1 on the partial canister comment. Although a very accurate estimation of remaining fuel can be made by measuring full and empty canister weights then interpolating the current weight.

    Reply
  18. Clay
    Clay says:

    I am planning a CDT thru next year and I want to take my TriTi with me, but I am concerned about burn bans prohibiting alcohol stoves on one hand and the logistics of refueling canister stoves on the other. So I was wondering if I could find a compromise. I was thinking I would supplement TriTi with a tiny canister stove (like a MSR Pocket Rocket), using the canister inside the cone as a windscreen/pot stand if and when burn bans affected me. To keep pack weight down, I would not carry the wood-burning kit with the TriTi, relying on alcohol, with the canister as my backup fuel, to cook.

    Sound reasonable?

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Good contemplations Clay.

      1. For your TriTi look at Swissmar F65300 Fire Gel. Some users have made the call that this does not qualify as an alcohol fuel and have used it during burn bans. And because it is a get it does not easily spill, see this Video on Swissmar. Obviously you’ll need read the reg’s and make your own call on whether this complies or not. I cannot personally recommend that you use the fuel during a burn ban.
      2. using a canister in a the TD is not a good idea. It will heat the canister up, potentially causing it to explode. Canister stove operating instructions explicitly forbid using the stove with any sort of windscreen around the canister for exactly this reason.

      Hope this helps and have a great hike, -alan

      Reply
  19. Bob
    Bob says:

    Alan, thank you again for your priceless site and valuable feedback. I’ve been doing a lot of research – two years worth. My Ti-Tri Sidewinder w/ Toaks has been ordered and should be in the mail any day now. I’m curious as to why you didn’t make much–if any–mention of Esbit/hexamine? Is it just that you prefer the ‘Greener’ fields of denatured alcohol, or am I missing something?

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Nothing wrong with Esbit. It is ligher than alcohol (same energy/per weight as canister fuels–so double that of alcohol). I personally find the Esbit smell slightly nauseating and it puts me off my feed for dinner which is why I don’t use it. But others do not feel this way.

      Major downside is that if you need to do air travel, Esbit is very difficult to purcahse when you land. -a

      Reply
  20. Russell
    Russell says:

    I noted that you use the original Zelph stove instead of the “modified” Zelph stove which is supposedly better-suited for use with the Caldera system. Any particular reason?

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Actually the original is better for wider diameter pots in the 0.9 to 2 liter range like TD’s Toaks. It works just fine in the Caldera. The standard Zelpf burns faster than the mod’ed one but has the same fuel efficiency. So you get your coffee or meal faster but don’t waste fuel. (And FWIW these large diameter pots transfer heat better and are more fuel efficient than small diameter “pots” like the SnowPeak 600 ml mug, and beer can pots. They are also a lot easier to cook in and clean.)

      The mod’ed burner was created for low volume, small diameter pots like the SnowPeak 600 ml mug, and beer can pots. It has a smaller concentrated flame for the smaller bottom of these pots. And because you aren’t boiling all that much water the slower boil time is not as big a deal.

      Reply
  21. Andrew
    Andrew says:

    While I do like alcohol stoves, I have recently been working on backpacking dinners (curry chicken, chicken alfredo, beef stew) that require some simmering to come out well. For me the JetBoil Minimo at a fairly light weight (14.6 oz) (personal base weight is nearing 8lbs) does the trick. Also found it on sale at $90. So I am willing to sacrifice some weight to be able to boil water for coffee, and simmer my slightly better than most option dinners. Just a thought and it has taken me a ton of time to figure out how I want to eat while hiking.

    Reply
  22. Gary
    Gary says:

    Good info. I am only about 8 trips into my JetBoil Flash. I love the efficiency and speed and the only concern is that the piezo igniter is not that reliable (I am afraid it will fail totally and soon). I am reading up on the igniters and they seem to be a problem for others, too.

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Gary, I would suggest always bringing some other form of ignition. Piezo igniters are notoriously unreliable. Not just JetBoil but most stoves. Not really sure why they are on stoves to begin with. All the best, -alan

      Reply
  23. Rand
    Rand says:

    Alan……thanks so much for the thoughtful review! A few notes …..possibly a little down in the “nits”…..but thought I would pass them along:

    1) The rig you evaluated is called the Ti-Tri Sidewinder…..and being our Ti-Tri (Titanium 3-fuel) it will also support a wood fire! Good fall back option at minimum should you run out of fuel…..though we have many customers that use wood as their primary fuel completely eliminating carried fuel weight

    2) We do have a “Caldera Sidewinder” that is just an alcohol/esbit solution….aluminum cone instead of titanium…..and as such comes in at a price point about 1/2 of the Ti-Tri system you reviewed. Here’s a link to our Caldera Sidewinder Solo: https://www.traildesigns.com/stoves/caldera-sidewinder-solo

    3) The quoted price of $120 includes the pot. That’s a fair thing to bundle into your price as you’re comparing it to the JetBoil that includes a pot. To your and Jeff’s comments, the pot and the cone are titanium, and as such come in at a slightly higher price point. The system is also available without the pot for $79.95.

    Thanks again for the great review!

    Rand :-)

    Reply
  24. Dave
    Dave says:

    Have both, love both. Have had no problems with either.
    There is no determining factor as to which I’ll use during an outing, but I do like the increased speed at which the Jetboil operates. Sometimes hotter faster is what I want…….. Plus the ability to fry is so much better using my Jetboil…….. And I haven’t any problem with the empty canisters. And yes, I do use them up, if not on the trail, then I use them up in the field during working hours, or simply by having a cup of coffee in the backyard. Puncture the empty and toss. And I never leave the country so not finding fuel has never presented a problem for me ……… yet.
    But in all honesty, most times I lollygag about and don’t mind just hanging out with my Caldera Cone. Plus, which is a big plus, no noise to speak of….. love that. No jet fighter noise to deal with. So comforting….. Late in the evening, or up early in the morning boiling water for my cocoa, coffee, or tea…… just listening to the wonderful world in the wilds. I probably use my Caldera Cone close to 70% of the time.

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Thanks Dave, my experience as well. I either have the time for the Caldera to boil, and/or I have plenty of camp tasks to do. I rarely, if ever have lost time waiting for a boil. Quiet is good.

      Reply
  25. Jeff
    Jeff says:

    It’s certainly possible, maybe even probable that Jetboil is playing games with advertised weight. I usually leave the tripod at home, and I don’t find stability to be a problem with the shorter Sol. I’ve heard some people also leave the bottom measuring cup/cover at home, and use something lighter for the lid. Of course, that goes beyond the scope of your discussion. I would worry about the Titanium fins being unprotected in light of reliability reports, but maybe I could see leaving behind the bottom cup with the Aluminum Zip or Flash Lite.

    My biggest gripe with any canister stove is the collection of half-full fuel canisters which I am somehow loathe to take on my next trip. :-)

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      >My biggest gripe with any canister stove is the collection of half-full fuel canisters which I am somehow loathe to take on my next trip.
      Amen!

      Reply
  26. Jeff
    Jeff says:

    You can lighten your JetBoil significantly by picking a different model. Although it has now been discontinued, the JetBoil Sol Ti is my all time favorite. I don’t have direct measurements handy, but online search quotes the Sol Ti weight at 9.9 oz minus canister. That puts it within competitive range to the Caldera Cone. I think they discontinued the Titanium products due cost as well as reliability issues (online reports of the heat exchanger fins melting off the cup).

    The current JetBoil Flash Lite has a quoted weight of 11 ounces.

    I also found the boil time of the Sol Ti to be on the low end of the 3-4 minutes you quote. When boiling water for 2-3 people, the fast boil time made a big difference, especially for the person who was last in line to get their water boiled.

    Reply
    • Alan Dixon
      Alan Dixon says:

      Thanks Jeff, good point that fast boil times are certainly a major strength of the JetBoil. Especially when boiling large amounts of water as you point out. And yes, sad that the lighter JetBoil Systems were discontinued (altho even at 10 oz the whole system would still be almost 1/2 pound heavier than the Caldera). I carefully weighed my very current JetBoil Zip in at 12.5 oz. That included the tripod, pot lid, and bottom pot cover. Possibly JetBoil is not including those on their spec’ed weight?

      Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.