Best Hiking Pants of 2026
Last Updated: January 4, 2026
Durable, lightweight, comfortable hiking pants with great pockets
As backpackers, we ask a lot of our hiking pants. We wear them non-stop for days at a time, frequently even sleeping in them. We scrape them over abrasive surfaces. We get hot and sweaty walking up mountains in them. We store all sorts of handy knickknacks in their pockets. And we wear them in rain, sleet, snow, wind, heat, and direct sun. As such, we are very particular, and you should be too!
What we’ve found after the past few years of testing is that, just like with shoes, trail running pants are better for hiking than traditional hiking pants. In nearly all instances, they are lighter weight, more breathable, more stretchy, and better suited for both movement and rest. And the lack of cargo pockets can be compensated for by additional on-body storage, such as a fanny pack.
While you’re here, don’t miss our other legwear guides! We’ve also reviewed the best merino leggings, lightweight fleece pants, trail running pants, hiking socks, hiking shorts, trail running shorts, rain pants, windbreaker pants, and men’s long boxers.
You make Adventure Alan & Co possible. When purchasing through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no additional cost to you. Here’s why you can trust us.
Quick Picks for Hiking Pants
-
-
- Editor’s Choice: Janji Atlas Multi
- Editor’s Choice: Path Projects Killam PX
- Men’s Convertible Cargo: Kuhl Renegade Convertible
- Women’s Convertible Cargo: Kuhl FreeFlex Roll-Up
- Innovative Women’s: Gnara Go There Pants
- Best Value: REI Co-op Trailmade
- Best Value, Convertible Cargo: REI Co-op Sahara Convertible
Hiking Pants Comparison Table
| Hiking Pants | Price ($) | Weight (oz) | Pockets |
| Janji Atlas Multi | 134 | 8.9 | 5 |
| Path Projects Killam | 98 | 9.0 | 5 |
| W’s Kuhl FreeFlex Roll-Up | 109 | 14.0 | 6 |
| M’s Kuhl Renegade Convert | 139 | 15.2 | 6 |
| REI Co-op Trailmade | 70 | 9.8 | 5 |
| REI Co-op Sahara Convert | 90 | 12.0 | 6 |
| Gnara Go There Pants | 168 | 16.0 | 5 |
Editor’s Choice
Path Projects Killam PX Trail Running Pants
The Path Projects Killam PX, which are technically designed for trail running, have become my go-to option because they’re stretchier, comfier, lighter, more breathable, and overall better to wear day-in and day-out than traditional hiking pants. The 100% polyester fabric with 4-way mechanical stretch is more durable than most other running pants, and quicker drying too, thanks to 0% Spandex. The zippered hand pockets are secure, bounce-resistant, and check all of the necessary boxes for storing a phone or other knickknacks, despite having an unusual downward pull closure direction. That being said, they’re not perfect – Path Projects is a menswear brand that does not offer a women’s fit.
- Price: $98
- Weight: 8.9 oz (Men’s Med)
- Fabric: 100% Polyester
- Pockets: 2 zip hand, 3 zip rear
- Pros: 4-way mechanical stretch. Most durable, quickest drying. Good looking. Great waistband. Antimicrobial. Ankle zips.
- Cons: Men’s only. Inverted zipper direction on hand pockets. Mesh pocket liner has ripping potential.
Editor’s Choice
Janji Atlas Multi Pants
Rather than traditional cargo pants, we now prefer trail running pants, and Janji Atlas Multi are the best overall pair available for both men and women. They’re extremely stretchy and overall incredibly comfortable, perfect for running, walking, lunging, high stepping, stretching, and even sleeping. Given the 23% spandex composition, they breath well and dry surprisingly quickly. That said, Spandex is relatively heavy, slows dry time, and increases smelliness compared to 100% polyester blends. Important features include the incredibly comfy waistband, and dual zipper hand pockets, which securely hold your valuables without fear or loss. In addition to slower dry time, the high stretch characteristic of these pants makes them more prone to snagging. Ergo, we don’t recommend these for bushwhacking.
- Price: $134
- Weight : 9.0 oz (Men’s Med)
- Fabric: 77% Recycled Nylon, 23% Spandex
- Pockets: 2 zippered hand, 1 zippered center back, assorted waist pouches
- Fit: Trim
- Pros: Very comfy to wear and move in. Zippered pockets. Highly stretchy. Elongated ankle zips pull on over shoes.
- Cons: Runs small. Slower drying because Spandex. Small zipper pulls.
Best Men’s Cargo Hiking Pants
Kuhl Men’s Renegade Convertible Pants
For the most bomber convertible hiking pants with the best possible pocket configuration, we recommend the Kuhl Renegade Convertible. These are Alan’s top pick. The full setup include two thigh pockets, two hand pockets, two drop in pockets, and a rear zip pocket. The pockets are deep and secure. The fabric they’re sewn with is very durable, albeit trending on the heavy side. Fit is true to size. The biggest drawback is that these pants are a bit warm and kind of stiff thanks to all of the zippers.
- Price: $139
- Weight: 15.2 oz
- Material: 95% Nylon, 5% Spandex
- Pockets: 2 hand, 2 front thigh, 2 side thigh, 1 rear zip
- Fit: True to size
- Pros: Best pocket configuration. Incredibly durable. Convertible. Well-made.
- Cons: Heavy. Zippers add rigidity and structure to the leg.
Best Women’s Hiking Pants
Kuhl Freeflex Roll-Up Pants
Choose the Kuhl FreeFlex Roll-Up Pants because they’re soft, comfortable, convertible, stretchy, durable and come with a full set of usable cargo pockets. Rather than zip off, they have a snap-based system to convert to capri mode. We like the polyester FreeFlex fabric, which is quick-drying and mechanically stretchy instead of made with Spandex which smells bad, sags overtime, and dries slowly.
- Price: $109
- Weight: 14.0 oz
- Material: 100% Polyester
- Pockets: 2 hand, 2 back, 2 thigh
- Fit: Relaxed
- Pros: Full set of deep pockets. Incredibly durable for how soft they are. Converts to capris. Spandex-free stretch that won’t sag or bag.
- Cons: On the heavier side. Cargo pockets slightly too small.
Innovative Women’s Hiking Pants
Gnara Go There Pants
We nod to Gnara Go There Pants for what might be one of the best innovations in contemporary women’s hiking legwear, the GoFly™ zipper technology. Essentially, you can unzip a wide opening that runs from front to back through the crotch, and pee without taking your pants off. Other features include a full suite of pockets that include two hand, two rear envelope, and one zip thigh. The fabric is durable and stretchy, but thicker, warmer, heavier, sweatier than we’d normally prefer.
Read more in our Gnara Go There Pants Review.
- Price: $168
- Weight: 16.0 oz
- Material: 93% Nylon, 7% Spandex
- Pockets: 2 zippered hand, 2 envelope back, 1 zippered thigh
- Fit: Fitted, high-rise
- Pros: Pee without taking pants off. Stretchy. Good pockets. Very durable.
- Cons: Heavier and warmer than average hiking pants. Very expensive.
Best Value Hiking Pants
REI Trailmade Pants
Choose the REI Trailmade Pants because they’re a crowd-pleaser at a fair price. Relative to their humble $70 price point, they score very high user reviews and offer many of the same features as much more expensive pants. The pocket set includes two trouser-cut hand, two rear, and one zippered side thigh. The 96% nylon 4% Spandex fabric is light and stretchy. There’s not much else to say other than that this is really great value.
- Price: $69
- Weight: 9.8 oz
- Material: 94% nylon, 6% spandex
- Pockets: 2 hand, 2 back, 1 thigh
- Fit: Standard
- Pros: Breathable. Durable. Quick-Dry. Lightweight. UPF 50. Some Stretch. Trouser style hand pockets.
- Cons: Only one thigh pocket.
Best Value Convertible Hiking Pants
REI Co-op Sahara Convertible Pants
The REI Sahara Convertible Pants offer great value for a fully-featured pair of convertible cargo hiking pants. Both the men’s and women’s version benefit from cargo pockets on both thighs, in addition to the standard set of two hand and two rear pockets. Vertical zippers run the full length of the removable lower half , meaning you don’t have to ditch shoes for on/off. The 96% nylon, 4% Spandex is light, breathable, and reasonably stretchy.
- Price: $90
- Weight: 12.0 oz
- Material: 96% recycled nylon, 4% spandex
- Pockets: 2 hand, 2 back, 2 thigh
- Fit: Standard
- Pros: Full set of pockets. Good value. Convertible. Conversion does not require shoes off. Color coded thigh zips
- Cons: Zippers add weight and bulk. Scoop pockets can be hard to reach into.
Deep Dive on Features
100% nylon vs 5-10% Spandex
When shopping for hiking pants, you will frequently encounter models made of either 100% nylon, or ~90-95% nylon with ~5-10% Spandex, Lycra, or elastane. The obvious upside is that the more Spandex, the stretchier the pants. Stretchy pants improve the functional range of movement and can be more comfortable to walk in, and are definitely more comfortable to scramble or climb in.
However, spandex blends come with some downside as well. Compared to 100% nylon, Spandex-nylon blends are slightly heavier, absorb more water, dry more slowly, are less durable/more prone to snagging, and stretch out or “bag and sag” over time. Pants that are 100% nylon need to be looser fitting to compensate for the lack of stretch, especially if you have thicker legs. Flowy, loose-fitting pants can be comfortable, but also create their own challenges and interfere with stepping.
Thus, there is no perfect fabric for hiking pants, and whether or not to choose a nylon-spandex blend, or a pair made of 100% nylon is largely dependent on personal preference and the traits you value most. That said, people have voted with their dollars and brands have voted with their product lines, and most people seem to prefer pants with a bit of stretch.
Why we love cargo pockets
Cargo pockets seem to fluctuate in and out of style, but they have never lost any utility for hikers. Our ideal hiking pants have a large cargo pockets, one on each thigh. And two cargo pockets is strictly better than one.
They are useful for storing all sorts of things, including: sunscreen, lip balm, maps, phones, snacks, gloves, a hat, a wallet, mosquito head net, compass, and so much more.
Every time you can reach into your cargo pockets to access gear instead of stopping to take your pack off saves a couple of minute. Added up over the length of a multi-day hike, cargo pockets could save half an hour of gear futzing.
Hand pockets: scoop vs trouser style
Another feature worth discussing is hand pocket configuration, of which their are two main types: scoop pockets and trouser pockets.
Scoop pockets, commonly found on jeans, create something of a rounded 90 degree angle, allowing the hand to enter from the top, rather than the side. This does a superior job of securing the contents, but makes it more difficult to reach in and out of as their location at the hip crease can create contortion or tightness. Furthermore, repeatedly reaching into scoop pockets all throughout the day can start to chafe uncomfortably on the back of your hand.
Trouser pockets are far easier and more comfortable to reach in and out of, and feel more user friendly. But they also create a minor risk of contents falling out, depending on the position of your leg and the angle of the pocket. If you are considering a pair of hiking pants with trouser-style pockets, make sure they are extra deep to secure the load.
Perhaps the ideal hand pocket configuration is a blend between scoop and trouser, which is what we see on the Kuhl Renegade Convertible. Notice that the hand entry line is roughly a 45 degree angle, rather than 0 or 90. This is a best of both worlds feature, yet it is surprisingly rare.
Convertibles hiking pants vs non-convertibles
Convertible hiking pants, by which we mean those that zip off above the knee to create shorts, are always worth considering. Doubly so for backpackers. They have many benefits, but also some drawbacks. We will outline below:
Obviously, the main benefit is that you get two garments for the price/weight/volume of one. Being able to switch between shorts and pants is very handy in climates with big temperature fluctuations. And they offer major potential weight savings if it means you don’t need to pack shorts. This is a huge and obvious benefit that often outweighs the micro-downsides we’re going to list off below.
The downsides are less pronounced, but still very relevant. Primarily, when worn as pants, convertibles are simply less comfortable than non-convertibles. The presence of a stiff metal zipper creates an uncomfortable area at the lower thigh. Should your pants ever ride up, like in the middle of a large high step, the zipper may squeeze/choke/pinch the wide point of your mid-thigh, double so if you have thick and/or muscular legs.
Simply put, convertible pants are worse at being pants than true pants. What’s more, any pants can be rolled up and cuffed into capris. While this is less comfortable and far less airy than convertible pants in shorts-mode, it is at least something of a consolation prize.
If you’ve owned convertible, consider how often you actually convert them into shorts. People take advantage of this feature far, far less often than they envision that they will.
Lastly, convertibles are made with zippers. Zipper teeth can break, get stuck, get sand in them, and otherwise fail. You might be stuck with shorts, or worse, stuck with one leg in pants-mode and one leg in shorts-mode.
So should you choose convertibles? We think that’s up to you. If you’re the type who actually takes advantage of shorts-mode and/or are traveling to a climate that has very large temperature fluctuations, it could be very worthwhile. If you mostly wear them as pants and live in a cooler climate, or mostly wear them as shorts in a warmer climate, true pants and true shorts might be preferable.
Important bonus features for convertible hiking pants
If you choose to go with convertibles, there are a few important features to look for. All of the convertible pants in our guide have them, but they’re worth calling out.
First is the color coded zips. This helps you visually identify which lower leg goes with which upper leg.
Second is the lower leg zippers. They can run from hem to mid-calf, the knee, or even all of the way up to the main shorts zipper. This is useful in two ways, but also comes with downside. It is useful to have low leg zips in that they can be opened for ventilation.
It is even more useful because they allow the wearer to convert between pants and shorts without having to take their shoes off. This is especially important if you wear boots, and/or your shoes aren’t loose enough to be slipped in/out of without untying.
Lower leg zips can be a disadvantage too. Like the primary zip offs above the knee, the zipper teeth on the lower leg can also bend, break, stick, or otherwise fail. They add manufacturing cost that is always passed down to the consumer. Stashing removed lower pant legs in your pack is heavier and bulkier when they have zippers. Wearing pants with lower leg zippers adds additional stiffness, volume, bulk, and makes them less comfortable, rather than more comfortable.
Internal Drawstrings and Integrated Belts
In our opinion, internal drawstrings and integrated belts are just junk gizmos that seem attractive to brands and designers trying to sell a feature-rich product. They are less useful to the customers using them. While all well and good for non-technical garments, we dislike these features for any hiking pants with true zipper fly. They’re not for us, nor do we recommend them to you.
In our experience, internal drawstrings get stuck in the zipper fly, or interfere with the ability to use it. They frequently retreat into the inner sleeve and have be tediously pulled out, one inch at a time.
The drawstring is not very wide so it can create an uncomfortable amount of pressure in a concentrated band around your waist. We always wear a belt anyway, and a true belt is far superior in every single way to an integrated belt in terms of function, and pressure distribution, making the drawstring redundant in addition to inferior.
We also dislike like integrated belts for similar reasons. They add weight/cost/bulk. Like drawstrings, they are narrower, and less comfortable than a true belt. What’s more, pants designed with integrated belts often cannot be used with true belts. True belts do a better job of keeping pants up while also being wider and better at distributing pressure. And like drawstrings, true belts can also retreat into the inner workings of the pants and get stuck.
There are some good hiking pants built with drawstrings and integrated belts, including some models on this list. However, if we had a magic wand and could change those pants, we would still remove them and consider it an upgrade.
Why hiking pants over tights?
Compared to hiking pants, stretchy tights have fewer pockets, less durability, and less weather resistance and aren’t recommended in our guide. But if you like hiking in tights, please don’t let us stop you. Truly! Comfort is the single most important feature and you should wear what works best for you.
Hiking Pants Conclusion
We can’t stress enough how important it is to wear a well-fitting, comfortable, functional pair of hiking pants. The models in this guide have performed well for us, and we think they will for you too. Happy hiking! If you have any questions, please let us know in the comments.






















