ULA Nexus Review – ULTRA Backpack with Superb Pockets
Last Updated: May 3, 2025
ULA Nexus Review: Pros, Cons, and Comps
Learn about Nexus’s exceptional pockets, best-in-class materials, and unusual top Y-strap system
If you’re shopping for an ultralight, ultra durable frameless fastpack, decked out in external storage, definitely consider the ULA Nexus made with UltraGrid, or better yet, the ULA ULTRA X Nexus. The latter is strictly superior, made with waterproof, tough-as-nails, composite ULTRA X 200 fabric and will be the focus of this review. What sets this packs apart from most competitors in its weight class is the addition of a pocketed hip belt, and unique dual top side pockets. Read our complete ULA Nexus review for expanded pros, cons, when to choose it, and how it stacks up with the competition.
Stats for a fully-featured ULA ULTRA Nexus
- Weight: 22.3 oz
- Price: $280
- Materials: Challenge ULTRA X 200, UltraGrid, UltraStretch Mesh
- Frame: Frameless, with internal foam back panel
- Load Capacity: 25 lbs
- Internal Volume: 32L
- External Volume : 8L
- Accessories: ULA Shoulder Strap Pocket, ULA Shoulder Strap Bottle Sleeve, ULA Bear Spray Holster, Dry bags.
- Consider Its Peers: HMG Contour, Zpacks Nero, MLD Burn, Durston Wapta
- Pros: Ultralight. Best-in-class ultra durable waterproof fabric. Best-in-class external pocket suite.
- Cons: Standard drawbacks of frameless design. Unusually long sewn-in Y-strap must be loosened to access main compartment. Internal foam back doesn’t double as sit pad except at camp. Back panel not aerated.
Check out more great options in our guide to the best fastpacks. Check out more ULA content, including our ULTRA Circuit SV review.
You make Adventure Alan & Co possible. When purchasing through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no additional cost to you. Here’s why you can trust us.
ULA Nexus Review: Expanded Pros
Ultralight: Weighing in at just 22 oz, this pack is seriously ultralight, no doubt about it. The traditional target for ultralight packs has been about two pounds, with frameless designs landing in the 1-1.5 pound range. ULA Nexus hits the sweet spot, keeping weight off your back and allowing for more efficient hiking.
Best-in-class ultra durable waterproof fabric: ULA Equipment is known for manufacturing backpacks that survive multiple thru hikes, and the build quality and overall durability of the Nexus is no exception. Despite coming in at just ~22 oz, we expect this pack to last for many years. The ULTRA X 200 is an incredibly beastly waterproof fabric, at the top of the pack fabric power rankings, and nigh immune to abrasion. Despite being a few ounces heavier than some of its peers from HMG, Zpacks, MLD, and Durston, we would consider it to likely be the most durable among them. Another thing we appreciate about ULTRA X is its structurally stiff nature, which allows the main compartment to hold its shape and stay open while packing, despite a complete lack of frame.
Best-in-class external pocket suite: We can’t say enough good things about the external pocket suite of the ULA Nexus. It features the brand’s signature, massive UltraStretch mesh front pocket, which is large, stretchy, and surprisingly durable. This material is so great at what it does, because it presses items into place without allowing them to bounce, while still expanding as needed for bulky items. You basically get nearly the durability of pleated static fabric with the expanding capacity of traditional stretch mesh. This pocketed is augmented with an external zig-zagging shock cord that is great for storing foam pads or other bulky lightweight items, such as a fleece or wet rain fly.
The tall side bottle pockets offer deep, secure, shock-cord cinching closure, and are are sized to fit a pair of Smartwaters each. The hip belt pockets, which are rare yet highly welcome on a frameless fastpack, are adequately sized to fit a phone in a case or a few bars each.
Last but not least are the unique top side stretch mesh pockets, which are great for storing more day-use accessories. You can’t get to them without taking the pack off, so put items in here that you won’t need to access while on the move. This could be a potty kit, empty 2L water bladder, lunch ingredients, a windbreaker, etc.
Top Y-strap fits a bear can: While this is also a con (see below), the top Y-strap is exceptionally long, long enough to secure a bear canister while the pack is full. That being said, we generally dislike using frameless packs with bear cans and recommend a framed option if you’re going to carry one.
Mounted with two water bottle sleeves and a 1.5L Smartwater
ULA Nexus Review: Expanded Cons
Standard drawbacks of frameless design: While frameless packs usually offer up to a pound of weight savings compared to their framed siblings, they come with some major drawback including: increased pressure on shoulders; lower maximum load limit; and increased likelihood of lumps jabbing into your back. While these issues are genre wide and in no way unique to the ULA Nexus, the simple fact that it’s a frameless pack will likely rule it out of consideration for a majority of potential backpackers. The upside for Nexus specifically is that it has a padded hip belt, which when tightened, takes about a quarter of the weight off your shoulders and places it onto your hips. A beltless frameless pack might save a few ounces, but will add about five pounds of perceived weight onto your shoulders, ultimately causing more strain and discomfort.
Unusually long sewn-in Y-strap can’t be temporarily removed, must be loosened to access main compartment: So this is only one of two issues we discovered that are totally unique to the ULA Nexus. In order to secure a bear canister on the upper deck while the pack is full, the strap was made extra long – about five feet in total length. That’s all well and good. However, it’s sewn-in, and thus it cannot be removed or temporarily unbuckled; if you don’t want it, you have to cut it off permanently.
But leaving it in place while not using it is also annoying. Not only does it create strap clutter, you have to loosen it each time you want to access the main roll top compartment, placing one half of the slackened strap onto each side, and then cinch it back down to close up shop, tucking away the excess strap material into the front mesh pocket. It just adds extra steps that don’t need to be there. As ULA already offers a removable top Y-Strap on most of their packs, we’d like to see them switch the Nexus to that system, and move off the extra long sewn-in strap currently used here.
Internal foam back doesn’t double as sit pad except at camp: Generally speaking, we always like when frameless packs have a foam back panel, and the ULA Nexus does. They usually only weigh a couple of ounces and do a lot of work blocking lumps and stiff objects from jabbing into your back. Not having to carefully put all your soft items up against the inside of the back panel while packing makes life easier.
The other upside to foam back panels (especially external ones) is that they can usually be temporarily removed and do double duty as a comfy seat, eliminating the need to bring a dedicated foam sit pad. However, the way in which Nexus’s foam back panel sits on the inside of the pack makes it difficult to remove and impossible to replace without fully emptying your pack. Ergo, you can use it as a foam sit pad while at camp once you’re unpacked, but cannot do so while on a midday break, as you would need to fully unpack in order to set the foam sheet back in place. Examples of good external foam sit pad back panels in fastpacks can be seen in the Zpacks Nero, Gossamer Gear Skala 38, and Nashville Cutaway.
Not seam not taped, back panel not aerated: Lastly, there are a few features that are not applied to the ULA Nexus, that give some other packs minor advantage over Nexus. Both back panel aeration and seam taping are desirable characteristics (the former as seen in Durston Wapta, the latter as seen in Zpacks Nero and HMG Contour), but both add manufacturing cost and/or weight. Seam taping in particular is a nice touch because it weighs nothing and eliminates leakage into the pack, upgrading the overall status from highly water resistant to non-submergible waterproof.
Back panel aeration is also a nice touch in the way it can just feel comfier to hike in than having a sheet of sweaty ULTRA X rubbing on your back. All of ULA’s most popular packs, like the Circuit and Catalyst, have this feature. However, it does add weight and cost, so while we miss it, we agree with the choice to cut it in order to keep weight down for the Nexus.
Top Y-Strap cinched and tucked
Look at how long that strap is
Who Should and Should Not Choose it
Choose it if:
- You have a base weight of 10 pounds or less and are an experienced ultralight backpacker
- You value external storage pockets and high durability
- You don’t suffer from shoulder strain while wearing a backpack
- You demand a hip belt, even with frameless packs
- You intend to use the top Y-strap, potentially with a bear can
- You want the lightest pack in the ULA line-up
Don’t choose it if:
- Your base weight is over ten pounds (in which case choose a framed pack like the ULTRA Circuit SV)
- You don’t intend to use the top strap (its extra long and cannot be removed)
- You will test the limits of its water resistance (in which case, choose a seam taped pack like Zpacks Nero)
ULA ULTRA Nexus Vs the Competition
ULA Nexus vs ULA ULTRA X Nexus: From our perspective, this is no choice at all and everyone should choose the ULTRA X version because it’s strictly superior from a performance perspective. Essentially, if you’ve invested enough time/energy/money into assembling a sub-10-pound frameless-pack-compatible kit, paying $50 extra is a drop in the bucket for the upgrade to a waterproof and hyper durable composite fabric. Despite the inferior performance, the UltraGrid fabric is a bit more sustainable, and comes in a wider array of colors. That, plus a bit of cost savings might justify it, depending on what you prioritize.
ULA Nexus vs HMG Contour 35: The HMG Contour 35 is the most comparable option from ultralight juggernaut Hyperlite Mountain Gear. As far as weight goes, the Contour is notably six ounces lighter and has a cleaner top strap system, but costs $50 more, lacks a padded/pocketed hip belt, its pockets are smaller and worse overall, doesn’t hold a bear can up top, and its made with DCF – a slight step down from ULTRA.
ULA Nexus vs Zpacks Nero 38: Specced with a padded and pocketed belt, the Zpacks Nero 38 is about six ounces lighter weight, $100 more expensive, has a cleaner (but non-y) top strap system, has a external removable foam sit pad back panel, and can also be fitted to a running vest harness instead of traditional straps. The ULA Nexus is $100 less expensive, more durable via usage of double thickness ULTRA X fabric (200 vs 100), has a better front mesh pocket material (UltraStretch vs traditional mesh), has additional top side pockets, and fits bear cans better.
ULA Nexus vs Durston Wapta: The Durston Wapta costs about the same, weighs four ounces less, uses a newer composite fabric called ALUULA Graflyte that is less tested but hypothetically maybe superior to ULTRA, has both back panel and hip belt aeration, has larger hip belt pockets, a cleaner top strap system, and comes with built in shoulder strap pockets. The ULA Nexus has a larger capacity/superior front mesh pocket, additional top side pockets, and has a larger y-strap for holding bear canisters in place.
ULA Nexus Review Conclusion
There is no single best frameless ultralight pack. However, of all the top performers from all of the top ultralight brands, ULA Nexus is likely one of the most durable, and has the best overall system of external pockets. Generally speaking, it rivals its peer group in terms of price, weight, and materials performance. Despite our qualms with the sewn-in top Y-strap and foam back panel, it’s a really great fastpack and definitely worth considering if your base weight is sub 10 pounds. Happy trails!














