A sample food list spread sheet. (For my 2000 Rockies Trip — 5 days 4 nights.)
My thoughts on backpacking food are not for all. I tend to take simple, inexpensive trail food that requires little or no preparation. If you are interested in a lot of hot meal ideas and delicious gourmet trail food, you may do better to check with others. But if you are still interested read on.
First, when I solo, I don’t take a stove or cooking equipment. I eat cold food. I take caffeine pills for my morning buzz. I can deal with this. Not cooking does limit my food choices a bit. Most ultralight backpackers do take stoves. Just small light ones. (When I hike with others, I usually take a stove, and do civilized stuff like make coffee & tea and hot dinners.)
I do not carry extra food. I figure I can make it at least 3 days without any food. I’ve had to do this before and feel comfortable with my choice. This is not a recommendation for others to do the same. You’ll have to make your own decision on this point.
How I “skip” one days worth of food: I eat a huge breakfast or lunch before I start hiking the first day and I eat a huge meal when I get out. By boosting my off trail calories on the first and last day I eliminate carrying a whole day’s worth of food in my pack. So for a weekend trip (three days and two night) I might only carry 3.5 pounds of food. This assumes a figure of 1.75 pounds of food per day.
What types of food should I take?
Try within reason to get the most calories per unit weight in your food. Obviously you want to have a balanced diet, with protein, carbohydrates, fats, fiber, fruit (dried), etc. A good target to shoot for is around 125 to 135 calories per ounce. Some ultralight hikers try to get in the 150 cal/oz range, but in my opinion their food is too high in fat and too low in almost everything else. I don't think this is a realistic or healthy way for most people to eat. On most of my trips even if I try to pump up the high fat foods, like peanut butter and chocolate, I always seem to end up around 125 to 130 calories per ounce.
I do know that it's unrealistic to assume that 1.5 pounds of food per day (a figure often used by ultralight hikers) will work for all situations, and for all people. Also, just because you can get by on 1.5 lb. of food per day, doesn't mean that it's the best way to eat. In my opinion, running a caloric deficit, especially on longer trips, is not a good idea. See my example below for more details.
Factors to consider for how much food you pack:
A recent experience: I took 1.6 lb. of food per day (Approx. 125 cal/oz.) on a recent 5 day trip in the Rockies. I was hungry on the days when I hiked 8-10 miles mostly on trails. But I could deal with it. I would have felt better, and in the long run hiked faster, on 1.75 to 2.00 lb. of food per day. One day, I did an 18 mile hike, most of which was off trail, with elevations over 13,000 feet. Boulder fields. Class 3 routes etc. By mistake, I brought only 1.6 pounds of food with me. By 7:30 PM, when I got in to camp, I was almost psychotic with hunger. My fault, I realize. I could have easily used 2 to 2.5 lb. of food for that day.
-Adventure Alan
_____________________________________________
An over simplified example. An estimate! (see Note 1):
A 160 lb. person has a base metabolism of approx. 2,400 cal/day.
10 miles hiking at 100 cal/mi is another 1,000 calories.
Assume 3,000 elevation gain is another 600 calories.
1.5 pounds of food at 125 cal/oz = 3,000 calories. (see Note 2)
Caloric deficit = 1,000 cal/per day. Or around 1/3 lb. of hiker per day.
Under this very simplified estimate, our 160 pound hiker runs a 1,000 calorie per day deficit. They would loose about 1/3 lb. per day or around 2 lb. per week. If our hiker was a bit overweight and didn't mind being hungry this might be OK. It's probable that they would feel better and hike faster if they weren't running a caloric deficit.
For someone near their ideal weight, running a 1,000 calorie a day deficit might not be all that great. It might be OK for a few days, but not for long outings. It's not that you can't do it if you have to. I've hiked 3 days without food. But is it a good idea to hike running a caloric deficit? Is it good for your health? Will you feel great and enjoy your outing? Will you hike your fastest? Will your body have the nutrition to recover after a hard day of hiking? Will you be more injury prone? Will you be alert and make safe decisions? What will your moods be like around others? After answering these questions for myself, I'd say that hiking with a daily calorie deficit is not a great idea.
-Adventure Alan
Note 1: I realize that this is a this very simplified estimate. Base metabolism, hiking efficiency, etc. are variable. The best approach is to do some on or off trail testing and see what caloric intake works best for you. Note that you may be able to get by on a low calorie intake but your athletic performance may go down as well. I know that I can eat 2,200 calories a day and ride my bike 175-200 miles per week. I also know that if I do this, I feel terrible, I loose around 2 lb. per week, I can be cross with those around me, and my overall riding speed drops 1-2 mph. At around 3,200-3,500 calories a day I feel great, don't gain weight, and can train at high intensity.
Note 2: I believe that most of us will end up averaging around 125-130 cal/oz even when packing high fat items like chocolate and peanut butter, etc. as part of our food. I know that many try to hit the 150 cal/oz range, but I don't think this is a realistic or healthy way for most people to eat. Just my opinion.
-AA